<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Progressive Democrats of America Blog - Latest Comments in A simple answer to a complex question</title><link>http://progressivedemocratsofamericablog.disqus.com/</link><description>PDA Blog - progressive discussion threads news stories</description><atom:link href="https://progressivedemocratsofamericablog.disqus.com/a_simple_answer_to_a_complex_question/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:36:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A simple answer to a complex question</title><link>http://blog.pdamerica.org/2009/07/a-simple-answer-to-a-complex-question/#comment-13237120</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why does HR 676 use the words: "resident" and "individuals" instead of "citizen"?  I am very concerned about these substitutes that allow in illegals.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">barbkunkel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:36:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>